Title Under Header

.
Showing posts with label Law. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Law. Show all posts

Thursday, October 22, 2015

Joke ~ Law News

Don't understand this... see News Article below. The Lawyer lost the case so this guy went to jail and lost his job, but still charge him legal fees amounting to $38,000. The Lawyer should have known the chances of wining is zero and not taken the direction that he took. I don't know the Law, but I am very sure that the lawyers fees for this case of graft did not have to be so expensive. Even if this guy insisted on going on with this case, the lawyer could have refused to proceed. I'll have to speak with a lawyer to understand this... but I'm afraid to... because it may cost a $38,000. This is not a laughing matter... this is a joke.

===.
.
.
News Article
http://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/courts-crime/afro-asia-building-fire-murder-accused-kept-legal-and-financial-troubles-away

Afro Asia Building fire: 
Murder accused kept legal and 
financial troubles away from family

PUBLISHED
by Amir Hussain
Thu, 2015 Oct 22

SINGAPORE - The man accused of murdering the wife of his former lawyer in his office in the Afro Asia Building four years ago kept his legal and financial troubles away from his children, the High Court heard on Thursday (Oct 22).

More details about Govindasamy Nallaiah, 70, emerged in court as his three children, a son-in-law and a family maid took the witness stand on the third day of the murder trial.

The prosecution alleges that on Aug 10, 2011, Govindasamy, angered over a legal fee dispute lasting almost a decade, took a bicycle chain and padlock from his bag and hit Madam Low Foong Meng, 56, on the head until she collapsed.

He then purportedly used a lighter to set alight some files on a table, then watched the fire spread before leaving Madam Low unconscious inside the burning unit.

On Thursday, the court heard that Govindasamy was a Customs officer for over 30 years when he was investigated for graft in 2002.

He engaged Madam Low's husband, lawyer Rengarajoo Rengasamy Balasamy, to represent him during the trial, but never settled his legal fees.

His eldest children, daughter Letchmi Ghandi Govindasamy and son Ramanathan Govindasamy, both civil servants at the time, stood as guarantors for the fees which amounted to $25,000.

But the children told the court they did not know what their father's corruption case was about. After his conviction, Govindasamy was sacked and had his retirement benefits terminated.

He became a taxi driver after he came out of prison, working seven days a week. He also sold his private property at 24 Casuarina Road below valuation in 2005.

Later, with his wife and their younger son, he moved into his daughter's Jurong West home. She lived with her husband, their daughter and a maid.

When she and Mr Ramanathan started getting letters from Mr Rengarajoo's firm, indicating that legal action would be taken to recover the outstanding fees, he reassured them that he would settle the matter.

Sometime in late 2010 to early 2011, Ms Letchmi Ghandi offered to pay the $38,000 owed. But her father stopped her from doing so, saying that a legal action had already been taken against her.

In July 2011, Mr Ramanathan also went to see Mr Rengarajoo as he had received a letter indicating that his law firm would be proceeding with a Writ of Seizure and Sale.

He offered the lawyer $10,000, with the remainder to be repaid in instalments, but this was rejected by Mr Rengarajoo.

Mr Ramanathan later got a letter stating that if full repayment was not made by Aug 10, the lawyer would proceed to take a writ of seizure against the former's home.

When Mr Ramanathan scolded his father for getting him into trouble, possibly losing his job, Govindasamy told his son not to worry and said he would find a way out.

The trial continues.
More details about Govindasamy Nallaiah (in red), 
seen here in 2011, emerged in court on Oct 22, 2015.
.
.
===.

Friday, May 22, 2015

Law ~ She sue the hotel after she slipped and fell its wet floor

She sue the hotel after she slipped and fell its wet floor.

Wah! Defence Lawyer did PI work to prove she can walk.

Maybe... she should NOT have gone for that walk.

But... maybe she was trying to see if she could walk, and ONLY knew for certain after that walk that her condition was "steadily deteriorating".

But definitely... I do not have all the details of this story to make a FULL commentary.

Ok then... PARTIAL commentary.

===.
.
.

The Straits Times
www.straitstimes.com
Published on May 21, 2015

Woman who sought $3.3 million for knee fracture in fall gets $9,000 in court award

By K C Vijayan

SINGAPORE - A woman who sought some $3.3 million damages in probably "the most expensive knee injury ever claimed" will have to settle for $9,000 after the High Court was not convinced she could not walk or work as before.

Briton Pamela Mykytowych had suffered a fractured left knee when she slipped and fell on the wet floor of the VIP Hotel lobby near Newton MRT in May 2011.

The hotel accepted 50 per cent liability for the mishap and it was left to the court to assess the damages payable.

A High Court hearing was held in February where the 50-year-old former endurance racing driver sought damages for loss of future earnings and a condition known as Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS). This was in addition to compensation for pain and suffering from the physical injury.

Justice Choo Han Teck in judgement grounds released on Thursday remarked that the claims for physical injury were "not difficult" to assess, which he set at $12,000. He also awarded about $6,000 more for pre-medical and transport costs. She therefore was awarded $9,000 ,at 50 per cent liability.

He noted the big ticket items related to her career record and social activities, as she had been an active person who enjoyed driving cars at car rallies.

She claimed that as a result of the accident she was unable to lead the kind of lifestyle she was used to.

Justice Choo found the fracture had completely healed and accepted she had sustained CRPS based on the medical evidence. But he found her claims of the effects of CRPS to be exaggerated.

Defence lawyer Ramesh Appoo produced evidence to show she went on a long nature walk in July 2012, "contrary to her much emphasised pain and how it prevents her from walking long distances to the extent that she is unable to work".

The judge found this was inconsistent with her claims that her condition had been "steadily deteriorating" since November 2011.

"I therefore find her claims as to her disability and loss of income to be untrue,"said Justice Choo.

Briton Pamela Mykytowych had suffered a fractured left knee when she slipped 
and fell on the wet floor of the VIP Hotel lobby near Newton MRT in May 2011.
-- PHOTO: ST FILE

Copyright © 2015 Singapore Press Holdings. All rights reserved.
.
.
===.
...

Friday, June 14, 2013

Law ~ Driving ~ Seat Belt

Know the law.

Wow! There's a lot to read... but basically... this is it.

Penalty for NOT wearing Seat Belt
~ Driver, a fine of $120 and given 3 demerit points
~ Passenger, a fine of $120

There is talk that there is another criteria for Passengers with Driving License... but it is not stated here in these articles.

===.
Date Updated:
Friday, 2013 Jun 14, 1001hrs
Law ~ Driving ~ Seat Belt
.
…..
Changes To Wearing Of Seat Belt Rules ~ by Singapore Police Force (SPF)

SPF Media Releases
23 Dec 2011

Changes To Seat Belt Rules And Testing Curriculum For Learner Riders

As part of ongoing efforts to enhance the road safety of road users, the Traffic Police will be introducing changes to the Wearing of Seat Belt Rules from 1 January 2012 , and the testing curriculum for learner Class 2B motorcyclists from 27 February 2012 .

Changes To Wearing Of Seat Belt Rules
A series of changes to the Road Traffic (Motor Vehicles Wearing of Seat Belts) Rules will take effect from 1 January 2012 as described below.

Change in criterion to determine use of child restraints and booster seats

Currently, a child below the age of 8 is required to be properly secured with an appropriate child restraint or use a booster seat cushion to supplement the seat belt while travelling in a vehicle. Those above the age of 8 are required to put on seat belts.

From 1 January 2012 , age will no longer be used as a criterion to determine if child restraints or booster seats are required. Anyone below the height of 1.35m will be required to be secured with a child restraint appropriate for a person of that height and weight, use a booster seat to supplement the seat belt or an adjustable seat belt. Those with a height of 1.35m and above, irrespective of their age, will be required to wear a seat belt. This change in criterion was made in consultation with the Ministry of Health and following a review of international standards and practices. This threshold height is found to be more suitable in deciding the proper fitting of seat belts and also consistent with current practices in countries such as the United Kingdom , Netherlands , Sweden , Finland , and Belgium.

To ensure that those affected by this change have sufficient time to obtain the required booster seats, child restraints and adjustable seatbelts, a grace period of one month will be given. For the month of January 2012, Traffic Police officers on patrol will offer advice to motorists instead of taking enforcement action when they come across those who are below 1.35m who fail to use a booster seat, child restraint or adjustable seatbelt.

Removal of exemption from child safety seat requirements for small school buses

From 1 January 2012 , all school children and passengers travelling on board small school buses shall be required to wear the appropriate child restraints or seat belts. This change is in line with corresponding changes made by the Land Transport Authority that require the mandatory installation of retractable three-point seat belts in small school buses by 31 December 2011 .

Responsibility of bus conductor/attendant on board small school buses

Drivers of small school buses as well as bus conductors or attendants on board small school buses will have to ensure that their passengers are properly secured with the appropriate child restraints or seat belts. If they fail to do so, bus conductors or attendants will be liable to a composition fine of $120/-, while the driver will be liable to a composition fine of $120/- and 3 demerit points. This change recognizes the important role of school bus conductors and attendants in ensuring the safety of school children on board and making sure that their seat belts are properly fastened.

Exemption of Child safety seat requirements for taxis

Taxis will continue to be exempted from child safety seat requirements. This is because it would not be practical for taxis to carry a number or variety of child safety seats which are of different sizes.
However, research has shown that children face a greater risk of injury when travelling in the front seat. As such, a child or person below 1.35 m should only ride in the rear seats to minimise the risk of injury in the event of an accident. Anyone below the height of 1.35m who rides in the front passenger seat of a taxi will be required to use his/her own child restraint or booster seat to supplement the seat belt. For failing to do so, the taxi driver will be liable to a composition fine of $120/- and 3 demerit points. The passenger will also be liable to a composition fine of $120.

Engagement with stakeholders

The Traffic Police have engaged the relevant stakeholders such as the bus associations and taxi companies on the changes. These organisations support the changes in view of the positive impact it would have on overall road safety. Separately, letters have been sent to parents of school going children informing them of the changes to the revised rules. The support of parents are sought to remind their children on the importance of buckling up for their own safety no matter how short the journey is.

Testing Curriculum For Learner Class 2B Motorcyclists

Motorcyclists and their pillion riders remain the most vulnerable group of road users, accounting for almost half of all road fatalities in 2010. Currently, Class 2B learner riders are only required to pass one theory test- the Riding Theory Test, which is a combination of both basic theory and riding theory in a single test. With effect from 27 February 2012 , all learner riders will be required to pass two separate theory tests - Basic Theory Test and Riding Theory Test before they are allowed to take the practical riding test. The Basic Theory Test comprises 50 multiple choice questions (MCQs) and covers traffic signs, traffic rules and regulations. The Riding Theory Test will be revised to focus solely on motorcycle-related riding knowledge. A pass is obtained with 45 or more correct answers for each test.

The new two-tiered theory test structure thus allows for deeper and wider testing of the local traffic rules and motorcycle handling knowledge, before learner riders are allowed on the roads. The aim is to enhance riding competency and reduce incidence of errant behavior and accidents. This test structure will also be consistent with the requirements for Class 3 or 3A driving licences for cars that similarly feature a two-tiered theory test model.
With this change, Class 2B learner riders and Class 3/3A learner drivers will take a common Basic Theory Test. Those exempted from taking the Basic Theory Test will include holders of a valid Class 3, 3A, 4, 4A and 5 Singapore driving licence and those who already possess a pass record for their Basic Theory Test.

To minimise the impact on the current batch of learner motorcyclists, the change in the theory test structure will not affect those who sit for their Riding Theory Test before 27 February 2012 . Following the change, the waiting time for the Class 2B two-tiered theory tests will be closely monitored. Current capacity can be increased to manage any additional demand for theory tests. The Traffic Police will endeavour to keep the waiting time for both tests manageable.

Commander of Traffic Police, Assistant Commissioner of Police Cheang Keng Keong said, “The new measures are part of a series of ongoing initiatives by the Traffic Police aimed at improving road safety. I thank the stakeholders involved for their invaluable feedback and would like to urge all parents to educate and remind their school-going children on the importance of wearing seat belts. We all play a part in making our roads safe for our loved ones and fellow road users.”

PUBLIC AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT
SINGAPORE POLICE FORCE
23 December 2011 @ 3.00pm
…..
.
===.
Date First Posted: 
Friday, 2013 Jun 14, 0944hrs
Law ~ Driving ~ Seat Belt

Know the law.

Penalty for NOT wearing Seat Belt
~ Driver, a fine of $120 and given 3 demerit points
~ Passenger, a fine of $120

There is talk that there is another criteria for Passengers with Driving License... but it is not stated here in this article.

===.

===.
.
…..
The Seat Belt Traffic Rules in Singapore

The seat belt traffic rules in Singapore was implemented since 1993. All vehicles registered on or after 1st Jan 1993, must have rear seat belts. Traffic Police of Singapore has been carry out frequent enforcing measure and educating the public on how importance that seat belts can save the lives, especially on the rear seat belts. 

All passengers, including the children sitting at the rear of the car will need to have their seat belt on. In Singapore, any children below the age of 8 will need to be seated in a child safety seat  The reason for enforcing children below the age of 8 to sit inside the child safety seat is due to their height may not be able to use the adult seat belt safely, hence they are best protected when sitting inside the child safety seat. Adults are encourage to sit next to the child and tell stories or play games with them, in order to get their attention occupied and to remain in the safety seat.

Pregnant women are not exempted from the seat belt rules too. It may be even safer for a pregnant woman to be belted up as it protects the foetus. However, if one is able to submit a medical certification  to traffic police for consideration, to prove that they are not suitable to have the seat belt on due to pregnancy.

Any passengers taking a cab or taxi must also have their seat belt on too. Taxi drivers will have to tell their passengers that the law requires them to belt up and that both the driver and the passenger will be penalized for not abiding by the law.
Very often, there are rear seat passengers getting seriously injured due to not buckling up the seat belt when sitting at the rear of the vehicle.  The traffic police view this as a serious traffic offence. The penalties for drivers of not wearing a seat belt will be fined $120 and given 3 demerit points. A $120 fine will be imposed on the passengers inside the vehicle and is not belted up.
…..
.
===.

Law on Sham Marriage

Know the law.

Chinese National & Singaporean Man... jailed six months for entering into sham marriage.

The maximum penalty is a $10,000 fine and 10 years' jail.
.
News
Woman jailed six months for entering into sham marriage with Singaporean man
Published on Jun 13, 2013 at 1:19 PM, by Elena Chong

A woman from China was jailed for six months on Thursday for entering into a marriage of convenience with a Singapore citizen.

Shen Huimin, 39, had admitted to marrying Darren Lee Kay Choong, 43, at a cafe at the Registry of Marriages in return for giving Lee $3,000 through her sister, Shen Jun also known as Ah Moon on Feb 28.

The court heard that Shen's elder sister arranged for her to enter into the sham marriage with Lee to get a visit pass. Shen agreed and gave $3,000 to her sister to pass it on to Lee.

On Feb 28, the couple went to the ROM to complete the formalities of the marriage before they proceeded to Inspired by Luv Cafe for the solemnisation.

After the marriage, they did not consummate the marriage. The couple continued to stay with Ms Shen Jun at her home in Prome Road, but at different rooms.

Lee was jailed six months last week for a similar offence.

The maximum penalty is a $10,000 fine and 10 years' jail.
…..
.
===.

Wednesday, December 05, 2012

Know The Law

Wow! "... 18 months in jail and three strokes of the cane...". 
I think this is considered very much like vandalism which is also punishable by the cane in Singapore.

~~~
.....
News ~ Singapore


 Picture Caption:
Unable to pay off his $400 loans from an unlicensed moneylender, a 19-year-old full-time national serviceman became a 'commando" - a harasser for a loanshark - and set fire to the homes of debtors. On Tuesday, Bernard Quek He Feng, now 21, was sentenced to 18 months in jail and three strokes of the cane. -- ST PHOTO:  WONG KWAI CHOW

UNABLE to pay off his $400 loans from an unlicensed moneylender, a 19-year-old full-time national serviceman became a 'commando" - a harasser for a loanshark - and set fire to the homes of debtors.

On Tuesday, Bernard Quek He Feng, now 21, was sentenced to 18 months in jail and three strokes of the cane.

A district court heard that he was paid $120 for each home that he targeted for the loanshark known only as Kilat. Quek bought a tin of kerosene, which he would pour into a plastic bottle whenever he received an assignment.

He would scribble loanshark graffiti on the wall and then either splash the kerosene on the main door or on nearby shoe racks before setting these on fire.

He would then report back to Kilat, who may call the victim and threaten to inflict worse damage if the loan is not repaid.

Quek admitted to harassing owners of four flats in November and December last year. He was given a discharge not amounting to an acquittal on two other charges.
.

~~~

Monday, February 20, 2012

News ~ Know The Law ~ Hit & Run

===.
Anyone involved in a hit-and-
run accident can be fined up 
to $3,000 or jailed up to a year 
under the Road Traffic Act. 

This is applicable even 
if the victim is an animal.

===.


===.


===.


===.


===.

Monday, January 30, 2012

Don't Drink & Drive ~ What Happens, The Law, The Penalty

Click on image to enlarge...


Don't Drink & Drive
~ What Happens, The Law, The Penalty 
~ ST, 2012 Jan 17, Tue, Pg C11

Friday, April 17, 2009

An Inspiration ~ From breaking the law to fighting for it

What an inspiring true story.

===.
.
From breaking the law to fighting for it
By Jeanette Tan | Yahoo! Newsroom – Fri, Jul 6, 2012
.
Picture Captions
.
Darren Tan ~ 01
Now 34, Darren Tan has undergone a major transformation from convict to law student. 
(Photo courtesy of Jurong Lake Run)
.
Darren Tan ~ 02
Darren (back row, second from left) takes part in the annual Yellow Ribbon Run. 
(Photo courtesy of Darren Tan)
.
Darren Tan ~ 03
Darren (centre) speaks to students from Maris Stella High School in an outreach programme.
(Photo courtesy of Darren Tan)
.
After four years in maximum-security prison, Darren Tan spoke so much Malay and Hokkien to fellow inmates that he lost his facility to speak English.

Now 34, he admits that no one he knew could possibly have guessed that almost a decade on, he would be studying to be a lawyer at the National University of Singapore (NUS).

An only child, Tan showed potential success in Singapore’s education system when he scored three As and one A* in his Primary School Leaving Examination.

He describes himself as a “latchkey kid”, however, saying he experienced a lonely childhood as both his parents had jobs.

“I spent my time on the streets a lot,” he tells Yahoo! Singapore in a candid interview. “I think the culture then was such that it’s like a natural progression — in secondary school, you get involved in gang-related activity. I don’t think it’s the case now, but I think that’s how it was back then.”

He said the gang of friends he hung out with was a large group of more than 10 people, all of whom he grew up with living in the western part of Singapore, where he still stays today.

• A wayward youth
.
Gang life for Tan was everything your tattoo-ridden, beer-drinking uncle could have told you about in the past — fighting, extortion, dabbling in an array of drugs — you name it.
His first experience with drugs was a sneak of marijuana when he was 14, stolen from the drawer of his friend’s brother. Tan and his friends then moved on to sniffing glue and popping sleeping pills, which he says were both very easily obtainable — in particular glue because it was cheaper, and at the time one did not need to register when buying it.

“(We did it) to get high, and to outdo each other — I think to show who was more daring,” he said. “(Drugs were) actually quite prevalent,” he added, explaining that one simply had to ask around, find out who was selling it or if anyone had a contact, in order to get some.

He was also first arrested at that age, on charges of rioting, but those were dropped and he was released after one night because the police lacked sufficient evidence.

“After my first police lockup, my mother was very concerned so she tried to impose some restrictions on my freedom… and then I think it just got worse from there,” he said.

To his principal’s surprise, Tan scraped through his ‘O’ Levels with a respectable 20 points for his best six subjects even though he “didn’t go to school much”, and secured a spot in the electronics, computer and communications engineering course at Singapore Polytechnic.

He soon stopped going home, however, and lived the proverbial nomadic life with his friends, staying either in hotels in Geylang and Joo Chiat, or at other people’s houses.

They paid their way dealing in drugs, extortion and robbery. “We didn’t really share it; we just used it up. It’s a very communitarian lifestyle,” he added.

Naturally, school had once again fallen by the wayside for Tan, and he dropped out from his polytechnic course after skipping too many classes.

Tan says he can’t remember how many times he was arrested in all, but he was detained three times — amounting to some 10 years and eight months of prison time altogether. The first two of these were spent in a reformative training centre, a sort of “middle ground” between Boys’ Home and prison, as he was 18 years old at the time.

By the time he was put behind bars in 2000 for his second sentence, Tan was 21, and he had in his words “graduated” to Ice, after taking and dealing in a host of other drugs including ecstasy and erimin, a tranquiliser. 

“It (Ice) was killing me,” he admitted. “I was very thin and malnourished (by then), and would have probably died if I wasn’t caught.” 

Tan’s second sentence was his longest, spanning eight years, and though he was eventually released early, he had only been out of reformatory for 11 months when he was caught for trafficking, possession and consumption of various drugs.

Tan’s jail sentences came with caning as well — and he was given a total of 19 strokes throughout his time there.

• Breakthrough
.
It was during his second sentence that he experienced what he describes as a “breakthrough” with himself.

“I was very disillusioned with my past, and by then I had seen enough of this circle to really want to disassociate myself from it,” he said.

When faced with four walls in his maximum security prison cell, Tan said he started to think more deeply about himself, his thoughts and his faith. It was then that he decided to make a change, and to work toward becoming a lawyer.

“I felt like God was asking me what I wanted to be, and I said ‘If you really are so great, you would make me a lawyer’, because back at that time if I had told anyone I wanted to be a lawyer I would've just been laughed at because I had nothing, I couldn't even speak English. And I felt peace after that. It was Him telling me he accepted my challenge and one day I would be a lawyer,” he recalled.

To regain his English-speaking ability, Tan put himself through a strict regime of reading English and Chinese newspapers every day, alongside books on topics ranging from food recipes to quantum mechanics.

He said he kept a dictionary beside him to check and remember the meanings of words he did not understand, and studied nuances in writing, as well as sentence and paragraph structures, but the use of the language became much clearer to him after he borrowed a book on grammar from the prison library.

Tan also joined the weekly toastmasters programme while in prison school, and became the president of the toastmasters chapter in prison, and practiced his spoken English further during a stint as a newscaster on an inmate-produced television news programme called News Behind Bars.

From there on out, Tan’s life unfolded in ways that one can only describe as amazing — taking the ‘A’ Levels after just nine months of intensive studying, scoring A, A, B, A1 in General Paper and A2 in Chinese, sitting for the NUS Law admission test and being interviewed in prison and gaining acceptance into the course in 2009. 

• The onset of more setbacks
.
All this, of course, did not come with its own set of challenges and setbacks. In the wake of his revelation of his new goal in life, Tan initially applied at least three times to go to prison school, in order to take the ‘A’ levels but was rejected partly because he was too early into his jail sentence to be shifted to prison school, which is located elsewhere, and partly for committing offences while in prison.

Tan explained that while in his first years in maximum security, he ran into a friend who had more or less told on him to the police, and ended up getting into a fight with him. That encounter delayed his entry into prison school, and even when he was finally approved for a transfer, Tan was placed into a two-year NITEC course in electronics, which further slowed him down. 
Although Tan received his ‘A’ level results outside prison, he was arrested again about six months after his release when he got into trouble trying to help a friend who was in debt. This time, his jail sentence — for possession of erimin, as well as long-term imprisonment for being caught the third time for drug consumption — lasted five years, putting the brakes yet again on his entry to law school, although in his last year in the lockup, Tan was able to take his NUS Law admission test and interview.

• From prison to the deep end
.
Even when he did start out in school, Tan said he felt like he was thrown into the deep end — lessons had started two weeks before he was released from prison, and he suspects he was the only student in his class who started classes sans a laptop and textbooks.

“I felt so lost in school. I was this guy sporting a weird hairstyle and wearing clothes from a long-forgotten era,” he said, adding that he was even asked on several occasions whether he was an exchange student from China.

He shared that during his first semester, he would make trips to the Botanic Gardens between classes and sit alone in the park, not making friends as he was conscious of his background, even relating an incident where he was not aware of a change in classroom venue (due to his limited access to email) and had to scour all the classrooms in the building to find it.

Things got better for Tan, though. His studies at NUS are currently being sponsored by the Yellow Ribbon Fund Star Bursary Programme, allowing him to take on less jobs on the side and focus on his schoolwork. He also found friends who reached out to him to sponsor his textbooks, his stationery, and guarantee his laptop loan, among other things he needed for school.

• More challenges ahead
.
Now on the cusp of his final year, Tan has secured his practice training contract with one of Singapore’s top 15 law firms, in the field of commercial litigation.

His last hurdle in his journey toward becoming a full-fledged lawyer here is, apart from graduating, in being called to the bar.

To do that, Tan says Singapore’s Supreme Court has to approve his being called to be an officer to it. While Law Minister K Shanmugam, whom he met once, had been very encouraging of Tan’s endeavour, Tan says things still remain uncertain for him.

“(Mine) could be a test case as I am not aware of any precedents,” he said. This means that Tan could potentially be the first convict-turned-lawyer in Singapore who has “such a long string of convictions”, provided he is called to the bar.

Despite the challenges he continues to face, Tan gives back to the society that provided the help he needed before. 

Since two years ago, Tan has been volunteering with Beacon of Life, a self-help group that reaches out to wayward youth. Initiated by Deputy Prime Minister Tharman Shanmugaratnam’s wife, the group is now working with inmates at the Singapore Boys’ Home.

Separately, Tan is also involved in Jurong GRC’s community outreach programme, which helps newly-convicted prison inmates and their families. When authorised by inmates, Tan and his fellow volunteers, who are made up of former convicts or veteran prison officers, visit families to see how they are holding up.

“We are suitable (for this) because we can advise the parents (of inmates) and tell them that prison isn’t bad, we went through it, and to answer some of their queries and allay their fears,” he said.

At the same time, Tan helps out with Architects of Life and Movementor Consultancy, groups involved in mentoring youth at risk, although his involvement here is on an ad-hoc basis, where projects come up.

“I think it’s mostly that I’ve been helped that much that I want to give back to society as well,” he says. “I’ve been given a lot of chances, some of which shouldn’t have been given to me at all, and I’m really thankful.”

Darren Tan is one of the “heroes” of the Jurong Lake Run, which will take place on Sunday, 8 July, between Jurong Lake Park, Japanese Garden and Chinese Gardens. Click here (http://www.juronglakerun.com/) for more information.
.
===.
Other Links.
.
.
• He went from jail to NUS law school
http://law.nus.edu.sg/about_us/news/2013/ST030313.pdf
Ex-offender turns his life around in jail and is currently in his final year at NUS Law. Darren Tan ’13 spent more than 10 years of his life in jail and received 19 strokes of the cane for drug and gang-related offences. Assoc Prof Eleanor Wong who interviewed Darren for a place in the faculty says he demonstrated maturity and humility. Come July 2013, Darren will be graduating with an LL.B. from the NUS Faculty of Law.
3 March 2013, The Sunday Times, Top News, Pg3

.
• Once in jail, but he's now a law grad
http://law.nus.edu.sg/about_us/news/2013/ST090713.jpg
Article features interview with Darren Tan'13, who graduates from NUS Law this week, and how he has worked towards his achievements.
9 July 2013, The Straits Times, Home, Page B4
.
===.
.